tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2428374771421713311.post7806638337092426300..comments2024-03-10T12:04:17.661-07:00Comments on The Oracle at Delphi: What happened to version 13?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10119008505905401707noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2428374771421713311.post-10647194996199557692009-09-04T04:15:00.000-07:002009-09-04T04:15:00.000-07:0013 was is a prime number. And all prime number Del...13 was is a prime number. And all prime number Delphi versions were good ones. Now we have to wait for Delphi 17 :-)<br>And Delphi 2010 definitely earns to have got a prime number.Andreas Hausladennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2428374771421713311.post-51302524085060317432009-09-04T06:00:01.000-07:002009-09-04T06:00:01.000-07:00Allen, thanks for the explanation. As a result of ...Allen, thanks for the explanation. As a result of your trivia, I had to tweak my build scripts (of our component framework) with a couple of extra if-statements. You know, one has to keep track the relation between the Delphi version, VCL version and BDS version (and the help2 namespace is yet another story).<br><br>Wouldn't it be fun, if they would advance the same pace, instead of stepping each in their own rhytm as has been the case for a while? Well, I suppose it would be just too easy to add support for a new version then.Jouni Arohttp://www.prosysopc.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2428374771421713311.post-6823314854642492762009-09-04T06:00:38.000-07:002009-09-04T06:00:38.000-07:00SDD = Superstition Driven Development... now I am ...SDD = Superstition Driven Development... now I am almost sure someone there thinks 64 is a bad number because of some numerology belief.... and is trying to postpone it as long as 128 bit processors are ready ;)Luigi D. Sandonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2428374771421713311.post-11241164705692673832009-09-04T06:15:18.000-07:002009-09-04T06:15:18.000-07:00Actually... now that I think about it. Maybe we sh...Actually... now that I think about it. Maybe we should make the next version 13 instead of 15. Wouldn't that be a hoot ;-)!Allen Bauerhttp://blogs.codegear.com/abauer/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2428374771421713311.post-2242901877926474572009-09-04T09:24:26.000-07:002009-09-04T09:24:26.000-07:00I'm with Andraeas. Historically the odd build...I'm with Andraeas. Historically the odd build numbers have been the best. Guess I'll have to put 2010 (14) on ice till 2011 (15)....:-)Ian Branchnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2428374771421713311.post-60694646289633909052009-09-04T17:18:20.000-07:002009-09-04T17:18:20.000-07:00@Andreas: D14 = 2 * D7, which means D2010 is twice...@Andreas: D14 = 2 * D7, which means D2010 is twice as good as D7!Uwe Raabenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2428374771421713311.post-83686031094226557392009-09-04T20:24:15.000-07:002009-09-04T20:24:15.000-07:00@Ian: Delphi 2005 was Delphi 9 what broke the odd ...@Ian: Delphi 2005 was Delphi 9 what broke the odd number theory.Andreas Hausladennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2428374771421713311.post-45363954826763236182009-09-05T17:58:14.000-07:002009-09-05T17:58:14.000-07:00Foolish move, not very scientific. 13 is fine numb...Foolish move, not very scientific. <br><br>13 is fine number, I live in street number 13. 13 used to be the best possible mark you could get on school/university courses (it is changed nowadays), I only ever got that once - but I got it at the best possible place.<br><br>Will Embarcadero also in the future skip version 4 of products to not frighten Asian customers?Rifnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2428374771421713311.post-42160913545733430822009-09-05T18:14:40.000-07:002009-09-05T18:14:40.000-07:00Oops, forgot to indicate the school/university 13 ...Oops, forgot to indicate the school/university 13 mark scale was in Denmark.Rifnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2428374771421713311.post-53258861721371314802009-09-06T05:35:05.000-07:002009-09-06T05:35:05.000-07:00Rif, I guess you didn't really get it. Since ...Rif,<br><br> I guess you didn't really get it. Since when was it supposed to be scientific? We were just having a little fun. Maybe that was lost on some people?Allen Bauerhttp://blogs.codegear.com/abauer/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2428374771421713311.post-38822690528965641992009-09-06T16:06:31.000-07:002009-09-06T16:06:31.000-07:00Allen, software development is not supposed to be ...Allen, software development is not supposed to be fun! It is an exact engineering discipline reserved strictly for masochists - which was just proved. You make some fun and we get an additional problem to solve :)Jouni Arohttp://www.prosysopc.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2428374771421713311.post-5486942811189084062009-09-09T01:25:55.000-07:002009-09-09T01:25:55.000-07:00Like an internal count ,it was to be always one nu...Like an internal count ,<br>it was to be always one number less from 0 as start count.<br>But a number skip is a error on code for the next<br>version on a must to be called<br>"the before 14 as real 13 now the real 14 one"<br><br>you know ,to the error message archive .<br>no random talking acepted,whe want it fix til next version .wdsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2428374771421713311.post-58869776173930041072009-09-09T06:23:20.000-07:002009-09-09T06:23:20.000-07:00It would have been much more fun if 13 stayed and ...It would have been much more fun if 13 stayed and the release codename had been "BlackCat".Luigi D. Sandonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2428374771421713311.post-18800785456596869062013-01-27T23:59:54.000-08:002013-01-27T23:59:54.000-08:00This reply is meant to skip 13 replies to your 13 ...This reply is meant to skip 13 replies to your 13 skipping story!Hari Nairnoreply@blogger.com